Academic Integrity refers to the expectation that all course and program-related work must be completed upholding the values of “honesty, trust, fairness, respect, and responsibility and courage” (International Center of Academic Integrity).
Many instructors in higher education still have plenty of questions about how generative AI will change the way we design learning experiences for students, and the way we assess learning, which includes considerations of academic integrity, chiefly plagiarism and cheating. This section of this guide includes links to resources, examples from colleagues, related to generative AI and academic integrity.
Q: Why don't we have an generative AI academic integrity policy?
A: We do. It's the academic integrity policy. You also have your own genAI policy in your syllabi.
Students may not cheat, fabricate, falsify, forge, sabotage, or plagiarize (or when it comes to other student conduct requirements: harass or threaten or cause other intentional harm). This literally covers all mis-uses of genAI. So now our job is to both convince and support students through our assignments and our language and our actions that student voice and insights matter, and that mistakes in good faith are of value in the learning process.
Note that at this time, March 2025, there is a Generative AI Academic Use policy proposal awaiting campus-wide adoption. See the box for a sample version of this policy.
Q: Are genAI outputs "sources" of information for academic work?
A: The foundation of academic/scholarly work is the ability to accurately track. credit, and retrieve the scholarly conversation on a topic or line of research - provenance and retrievability.
It's important to note that genAI outputs, such as ChatGPT's outputs, are generated using machine learning algorithms. Remember at this time, genAI LLMs use their training and our inputs to create an output of "predicted" word strings for that topic. There is no reliable provenance for this information, and while some subscription-based genAI tools provide public links to specific chats, the provenance problem remains. In addition, outputs may not be accurate or reliable; they are given to bias; they do not cite their sources, or they hallucinate non-existent sources. Additionally, outputs can be influenced by the user inputs that may include misinformation and bias. Generally speaking, genAI should be regarded as a tool rather than an information source.
Therefore, unless the assignment specifically allows for the use of genAI outputs as sources, they should not be used as sources for academic work if this is your intent for your students, to do the work of scholars. It will likely be necessary to instruct students on the work of scholars and the importance and value of provenance in academic work.
Winter 2025 - 5 credit College Success course
About generative AI and Academic Integrity
I have some non-negotiable rules about the use of generative AI (genAI). Please make sure that you understand the following extremely well, and if you do not, please ask me about it, because the use of genAI as a student can be kind of confusing to figure out what's appropriate versus inappropriate use.
Artificial Intelligence: We acknowledge the continued growth and sophistication of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Although generative AI (such as DeepMind's Alpha Code, ChatGPT, GPT-3.2, etc.) is a tool that can be used for creativity and learning, this class focuses on developing YOUR skills as a writer, reader, and critical thinker. Unless it is explicitly instructed in the written assignment guidelines to use it, the use of generative AI is prohibited.
---------
adapted from draft Academic Integrity policy - see box on this page
As faculty we will have different needs within our programs, courses, classes, and disciplines. We are also in a highly experimental stage of working with AI with our students.
AI outputs are not "sources." Sources are a person, thing, or place from which retrievable and/or specifically attributable information is obtained. This is not true for AI outputs. Citations for AI outputs are more about our methodology, so we cite the tool. Especially in terms of academic integrity, and understanding the nature of information and AI, the distinction is important to teach to our students. See the guides and guidelines below for information about citing genAI outputs and genAI use.
Except where otherwise noted, the content in these guides by Tacoma Community College Library is licensed under CC BY SA 4.0.
This openly licensed content allows others to cite, share, or modify this content, with credit to TCC Library. When reusing or adapting this content, include this statement in the new document: This content was originally created by Tacoma Community College Library and shared with a CC BY SA 4.0 license.
Tacoma Community College Library - Building 7, 6501 South 19th Street, Tacoma, WA 98466 - P. 253.566.5087
Visit us on Instagram!